1. 16 Jun, 2009 1 commit
  2. 09 Jun, 2009 1 commit
    • Li Zefan's avatar
      tracing/events: convert block trace points to TRACE_EVENT() · 55782138
      Li Zefan authored
      
      TRACE_EVENT is a more generic way to define tracepoints. Doing so adds
      these new capabilities to this tracepoint:
      
        - zero-copy and per-cpu splice() tracing
        - binary tracing without printf overhead
        - structured logging records exposed under /debug/tracing/events
        - trace events embedded in function tracer output and other plugins
        - user-defined, per tracepoint filter expressions
        ...
      
      Cons:
      
        - no dev_t info for the output of plug, unplug_timer and unplug_io events.
          no dev_t info for getrq and sleeprq events if bio == NULL.
          no dev_t info for rq_abort,...,rq_requeue events if rq->rq_disk == NULL.
      
          This is mainly because we can't get the deivce from a request queue.
          But this may change in the future.
      
        - A packet command is converted to a string in TP_assign, not TP_print.
          While blktrace do the convertion just before output.
      
          Since pc requests should be rather rare, this is not a big issue.
      
        - In blktrace, an event can have 2 different print formats, but a TRACE_EVENT
          has a unique format, which means we have some unused data in a trace entry.
      
          The overhead is minimized by using __dynamic_array() instead of __array().
      
      I've benchmarked the ioctl blktrace vs the splice based TRACE_EVENT tracing:
      
            dd                   dd + ioctl blktrace       dd + TRACE_EVENT (splice)
      1     7.36s, 42.7 MB/s     7.50s, 42.0 MB/s          7.41s, 42.5 MB/s
      2     7.43s, 42.3 MB/s     7.48s, 42.1 MB/s          7.43s, 42.4 MB/s
      3     7.38s, 42.6 MB/s     7.45s, 42.2 MB/s          7.41s, 42.5 MB/s
      
      So the overhead of tracing is very small, and no regression when using
      those trace events vs blktrace.
      
      And the binary output of TRACE_EVENT is much smaller than blktrace:
      
       # ls -l -h
       -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8.8M 06-09 13:24 sda.blktrace.0
       -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 195K 06-09 13:24 sda.blktrace.1
       -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.7M 06-09 13:25 trace_splice.out
      
      Following are some comparisons between TRACE_EVENT and blktrace:
      
      plug:
        kjournald-480   [000]   303.084981: block_plug: [kjournald]
        kjournald-480   [000]   303.084981:   8,0    P   N [kjournald]
      
      unplug_io:
        kblockd/0-118   [000]   300.052973: block_unplug_io: [kblockd/0] 1
        kblockd/0-118   [000]   300.052974:   8,0    U   N [kblockd/0] 1
      
      remap:
        kjournald-480   [000]   303.085042: block_remap: 8,0 W 102736992 + 8 <- (8,8) 33384
        kjournald-480   [000]   303.085043:   8,0    A   W 102736992 + 8 <- (8,8) 33384
      
      bio_backmerge:
        kjournald-480   [000]   303.085086: block_bio_backmerge: 8,0 W 102737032 + 8 [kjournald]
        kjournald-480   [000]   303.085086:   8,0    M   W 102737032 + 8 [kjournald]
      
      getrq:
        kjournald-480   [000]   303.084974: block_getrq: 8,0 W 102736984 + 8 [kjournald]
        kjournald-480   [000]   303.084975:   8,0    G   W 102736984 + 8 [kjournald]
      
        bash-2066  [001]  1072.953770:   8,0    G   N [bash]
        bash-2066  [001]  1072.953773: block_getrq: 0,0 N 0 + 0 [bash]
      
      rq_complete:
        konsole-2065  [001]   300.053184: block_rq_complete: 8,0 W () 103669040 + 16 [0]
        konsole-2065  [001]   300.053191:   8,0    C   W 103669040 + 16 [0]
      
        ksoftirqd/1-7   [001]  1072.953811:   8,0    C   N (5a 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 24 00) [0]
        ksoftirqd/1-7   [001]  1072.953813: block_rq_complete: 0,0 N (5a 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 24 00) 0 + 0 [0]
      
      rq_insert:
        kjournald-480   [000]   303.084985: block_rq_insert: 8,0 W 0 () 102736984 + 8 [kjournald]
        kjournald-480   [000]   303.084986:   8,0    I   W 102736984 + 8 [kjournald]
      
      Changelog from v2 -> v3:
      
      - use the newly introduced __dynamic_array().
      
      Changelog from v1 -> v2:
      
      - use __string() instead of __array() to minimize the memory required
        to store hex dump of rq->cmd().
      
      - support large pc requests.
      
      - add missing blk_fill_rwbs_rq() in block_rq_requeue TRACE_EVENT.
      
      - some cleanups.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
      LKML-Reference: <4A2DF669.5070905@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      55782138
  3. 22 May, 2009 1 commit
  4. 29 Dec, 2008 1 commit
  5. 26 Nov, 2008 2 commits
  6. 09 Oct, 2008 1 commit
  7. 16 Oct, 2007 1 commit
  8. 10 Oct, 2007 1 commit
  9. 24 Jul, 2007 1 commit
  10. 27 Mar, 2007 1 commit
    • Vasily Tarasov's avatar
      block: blk_max_pfn is somtimes wrong · f772b3d9
      Vasily Tarasov authored
      
      There is a small problem in handling page bounce.
      
      At the moment blk_max_pfn equals max_pfn, which is in fact not maximum
      possible _number_ of a page frame, but the _amount_ of page frames.  For
      example for the 32bit x86 node with 4Gb RAM, max_pfn = 0x100000, but not
      0xFFFF.
      
      request_queue structure has a member q->bounce_pfn and queue needs bounce
      pages for the pages _above_ this limit.  This routine is handled by
      blk_queue_bounce(), where the following check is produced:
      
      	if (q->bounce_pfn >= blk_max_pfn)
      		return;
      
      Assume, that a driver has set q->bounce_pfn to 0xFFFF, but blk_max_pfn
      equals 0x10000.  In such situation the check above fails and for each bio
      we always fall down for iterating over pages tied to the bio.
      
      I want to notice, that for quite a big range of device drivers (ide, md,
      ...) such problem doesn't happen because they use BLK_BOUNCE_ANY for
      bounce_pfn.  BLK_BOUNCE_ANY is defined as blk_max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, and
      then the check above doesn't fail.  But for other drivers, which obtain
      reuired value from drivers, it fails.  For example sata_nv uses
      ATA_DMA_MASK or dev->dma_mask.
      
      I propose to use (max_pfn - 1) for blk_max_pfn.  And the same for
      blk_max_low_pfn.  The patch also cleanses some checks related with
      bounce_pfn.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarVasily Tarasov <vtaras@openvz.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      f772b3d9
  11. 12 Jan, 2007 1 commit
  12. 30 Sep, 2006 1 commit